Thursday, October 3, 2013

Chapter 3: State and Empire in Eurasia

                After the first civilizations were established into the Ancient world, not much changed in the rise and fall of power between countries.  All regions were left alone to their own Monarchies, the rich were still wealthy, the poor maintained their poverty, slavery was still enforced, and women in most regions were still regarded as secondary to the primary males.  However, with the successful civilizations optimizing their resources and minimizing threats from their hostile environments, the biggest change seen within this period were the increasing numbers in populations.  As Strayer introduces us to the different realms, we will witness how each civilization refine their individualities with politics, religion, and other identifiable traits that define their culture.  The next major influences within this next big movement are the exchanges of trades and goods between the neighboring countries.  With the regions willingness to collaborate with each other in the trades, they began to develop each other’s efficiency with techniques to enhance the others with technologies and religions, but unfortunately some detrimental diseases as well.

                In Chapter 3, Strayer focuses on the Empires of Eurasia and North Africa.  He describes the functions of Empires in general by being “larger and more aggressive states, those that conquer, rule, and extract resources from other states and peoples.  Thus empires have generally encompassed a considerable variety of peoples and cultures within a single political system, and they have often been associated with political or cultural oppression” (p. 118).  The beginning of this “second-wave” era describes the dominant colonies of people that sought out to best the neighboring communities for their resources and man power.  For some colonies like the Persian and Roman Empire, the conquests for territorial expansion took several centuries when compared to the progress of the Chinese Empire.  For both the Roman and Chinese empires however, they succumbed to the eventual collapse of their regimes.  Strayer’s research exemplifies these detriments by showing examples of the negative results of expansion.  The empires had stretched themselves so far and vast that they began to encounter financial problems, they lacked the technology to sufficiently maintain the resources, and they eventually lost power of authority within the central governments.  Diseases also crippled both empires, and rivalries within the surviving elitists also weakened the suffering authorities—the empires were facing deteriorations both internally and externally; however, within the Chinese regime they were able to retain their political structures and disciplines like an inherited tradition, where the Romans were not successful in rebuilding their fallen empire.

                Not all empires suffered the collapse of expansion.  In contrast to the invasive actions of the earlier empires, India favored the values and moral teachings of Hinduism, which allowed for creativity and encouraged diversity in science, mathematics, art, literature, etc. toward anybody that resided within the community.   Most of the admirable policies didn’t last after the death of Emperor Ashoka, however, in today’s India as well as the peaceful activists, they continue to model the philosophy of Emperor Ashoka to promote cultural tolerance and nonviolence.  China continues to implement their strong faith in dominance with a strong government, and control their citizens with tight boundaries.  While the Roman Empire never recovered from their fall, it is heavily believed that the current United States of America adopted similar idealisms; like the Romans, the beginning of America had the similar interests of growth and expansion in “unclaimed” territory.  This provided opportunity for the soldiers and lower class to work hard in attempts to bring themselves out of poverty, while the upper class had access to acquire desirable land as well as self-appointing the pivotal political roles.  As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the Roman Empire had also created vulnerabilities when they were expanding to different regions—this could also be compared to the modern American involvements and inefficacies of Viet Nam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and potentially Syria.  With the rising power that America has in regard to the rest of the world, Strayer questions the reader if Americans have become the new Romans.

                This chapter was extremely difficult for me to get through due to the dynamics of the different empires, and how they grew from specialization into established governments of ruling people with laws.  It is interesting to note the diversity in which the cultures created their written laws and code of ethics—to believe in strict control of their people and the hunger for resources in certain regions, to the liberal practices that one could reside in another group.  While I can marvel and appreciate the distinguishable edifices and technologies that helped to create these diverse cultures, I also lament for the conquered citizens that became the slaves of these powerful empires.  Without them, it would have been too expensive to create the Pyramids of Egypt, the Great Wall of China, and even the United States Railroad system.  I also felt that Strayer’s thoughts on America becoming the next Roman Empire to be accurate with my own beliefs.  When learning about the Roman Empire in my elementary years, I had remembered learning their rise to power had created complacency, which had led them to their eventual downfall; I ponder if America will suffer the same fate of letting our dominance cloud the judgments of stability and homeostasis.  With more and more citizens losing the respect of their political leaders, and without any positive discernible changes between the populations both in and out of congress, it only forebodes my apprehensions of a struggling America.  Hopefully our history will not suffer the same fate as the Romans have with their removal of future existence.

No comments:

Post a Comment